MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acoustic System Identification with Partially Time-Varying Models Based on Tensor Decompositions

2022· article· en· W4312799022 on OpenAlex
Gongping Huang, Jacob Benesty, Jingdong Chen, Constantin Paleologu, Silviu Ciochină, Walter Kellermann, Israel Cohen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFinite impulse responseImpulse responseComputer scienceLTI system theorySystem identificationLinear filterMicrophoneInfinite impulse responseAlgorithmSpeech recognitionFilter (signal processing)AcousticsLinear systemMathematicsDigital filterData modelingPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic system identification, which aims at estimating the channel impulse response from a source of interest to the microphone position, plays an important role in many applications, e.g., echo cancellation for full-duplex speech communication. Generally, an acoustic channel impulse response is modeled as a linear finite-impulse-response (FIR) filter, so the objective of system identification is to identify it. While much effort has been devoted to this topic over the last five decades, identifying the room FIR filters accurately with only a small number of observation data snapshots remains a significant challenge. This paper studies this problem and proposes to model the acoustic impulse response, i.e., the FIR filter, with a tensor decomposition, which can be expressed as a multidimensional Kronecker product of a series of shorter filters. Then, a partially time-varying model is applied to acoustic system identification, where the global filter is decomposed into two parts: a time-invariant part, which captures the common properties of acoustic channels, and a time-varying part, which, as its name indicates, represents the components of acoustic channels that change with time. During the identification process, the time-invariant filters can be identified or learned in advance, while the time-varying filters are optimized through an iterative procedure. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed technique can achieve better acoustic system identification performance with a small number of data snapshots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTensor decomposition and applicationsFrench-language works237,207