MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312799511 · doi:10.15406/ijfcm.2022.06.00274

People with disabilities family: highlighting an ancestral knowledge to guarantee food security

2022· article· en· W4312799511 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Family & Community Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAging, Health, and Disability
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)Food securityWork (physics)RehabilitationSample (material)SociologyPublic relationsPsychologyGeographyPolitical scienceEngineeringAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following article describes the research carried out during 2020 in Santander de Quilichao, Cauca of the project called "Family Gardens for Santander de Quilichao" whose lines of work focused on food security and community strengthening in families with children with disabilities; through the implementation of community gardens and training for parents, addressing disability as a sample of human diversity. The project yielded positive results, having as a methodological reference the Community-Based Rehabilitation strategy; directly benefiting 45 families and 150 people, with a total of 30 urban gardens and 2 home gardens. The research carried out shows how community development can be approached holistically, taking up elements of the community; thus facilitating access to and participation of persons with disabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it