MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312799825 · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3215833

An EV-Scale Demonstration of In-Situ Battery Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and BMS-Limited Pack Performance Analysis

2022· article· en· W4312799825 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhe Gong, Avram Kachura, Seyed Amir Assadi, Nicholas Cusimano, Joshua Piruzza, James Y. Xu, Olivier Trescases

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersOntario Centre of Innovation
KeywordsDielectric spectroscopyBattery packBattery (electricity)Electrical impedanceState of chargeElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringNoise (video)Equivalent circuitEngineeringVoltageAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Power (physics)Computer sciencePhysicsChemistryElectrodeElectrochemistryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

State-of-power (SOP) and state-of-charge (SOC) estimation inaccuracy manifests throughout the electric vehicle (EV) battery lifetime due to the nonlinear degradation trajectory that is unique to each use-case. The inaccuracy leads to premature termination of charge and discharge operations, which results in the virtual loss of battery performance. In-situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been proposed to provide real-time battery impedance measurements, which can theoretically improve the SOP/SOC estimation accuracy. In this work, an EV-scale in-situ EIS system is demonstrated experimentally, from impedance measurement to equivalent circuit model (ECM) extraction. The pack-level discharge energy versus SOP/SOC estimation errors is also simulated, which quantifies the virtual loss of battery performance. The measured-impedance error tolerance of three common ECM extraction techniques is then examined through a randomized set of simulated EIS tests with injected measurement noise. Finally, in-situ impedance measurement is performed on 20 battery submodules using an electric pickup truck EIS system. The ECM-predicted voltage output is compared against measured driving data. Experimental results indicate approximately 8%–9% improvement in SOP estimation accuracy at 3 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula> C and 10 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula> C between the in-situ extracted models and a representative baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207