MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312800235 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.021

Manufacturing-remanufacturing systems with uncertain return: production control with estimation-in-the-loop

2022· article· en· W4312800235 on OpenAlexaff
Vladimir Polotski

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemanufacturingKalman filterProduction (economics)Rate of returnComputer scienceControl (management)Control systemEconometricsControl theory (sociology)EconomicsEngineeringMicroeconomicsManufacturing engineeringFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Production control problem for failure-prone systems that utilize both manufacturing and remanufacturing in production processes and are subject to return uncertainty and variability is studied. Proposed feedback control policies are based on the imprecise measurements. The return flow is unknown and its rate is composed of seasonal and random components. To cope with measurement errors and return variability, estimation and forecasting modules are designed and incorporated into a control loop. Market demand is supposed to be constant although may contain an unknown component (much smaller than the return). Kalman filter technique is used for estimating inventory levels and return rate online from noisy inventory measurements. Obtained estimates are used in production control procedure ensuring that the policy continuously adapts to current market conditions. The system behavior under large return rate variations is studied and cost effectiveness of the proposed policies is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207