MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312800313 · doi:10.23977/jemm.2022.070405

Design Optimization of an Electric Positioning Mechanism

2022· article· en· W4312800313 on OpenAlex
Xiaowen Zhao, Tongfei Li, Xiaogang Fang, Peipei Liang, Zhikuan Yang, Jiguang Liu, Youwen Yang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and Machinery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanism (biology)ThrustActuatorFrame (networking)Power (physics)ElectromagnetEngineeringPosition (finance)Mechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringMagnetPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The positioning mechanism of conventional transfer vehicles commonly employs a hydraulic or pneumatic driving mode, which requires control valves, actuators and pipe fittings, causing problems such as complex composition, high cost and inconvenient hauling of pipes and accessories when installed on transfer vehicles. In order to avoid the above difficulties, an electrical localization mechanism using electromagnets as power units has been designed. First, it explains its working principles and composition. Moreover, the implementation scheme and the structure of the electromagnetic thrust are then detailed, including the frame, the telescopic components and the power equipment. Next, based on the force analysis of the locator, we introduce the calculation of the electromagnetic thrust to the locator and design a reasonable angle between the locator and the pin. Finally, by switching the electromagnet on and off, the mechanism drives the positioning plate to reciprocate, thus enabling multi-position accurate positioning and rapid un-positioning of the transfer vehicle, contributing to the compact, low-cost and environmentally friendly maintenance of the mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it