MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312810405 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2022.050402

Ordering Problem of Vascular Robot Based on Time Series Prediction

2022· article· en· W4312810405 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xingxiang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotOperator (biology)Computer scienceContainer (type theory)Integer programmingMultivariate statisticsMathematical optimizationLinear programmingWork (physics)Integer (computer science)Series (stratigraphy)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsAlgorithmEngineeringMachine learningMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vascular robot is used to treat diseases related to blood vessels. The vascular robot can carry drugs into blood vessels to treat diseases related to blood vessels. At the same time, the operator needs a week of maintenance before he can continue to work. If the robot is not scheduled to work, it also needs maintenance, which will incur corresponding costs. This paper studies how to determine the number of vessels and manipulators to be purchased in vascular robots under different constraints. Firstly, this paper establishes a multi-step decision-making model and analyzes the best time to purchase the container boat and the operator. Then using the least squares curve fitting to analyze the data, through multivariate linear programming, multi-step decision, integer programming and other methods to solve, finally determine the optimal number of ordering vascular robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationFrench-language works237,207