MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312811868 · doi:10.9771/peri.v1i17.45278

A insegurança do cistema como impasse para a criminalização da homotransfobia no Rio de Janeiro

2022· article· pt· W4312811868 on OpenAlex
Germana Mello, Aryel Raphaela Guimarães Amaral de Sá, Iasmin De Oliveira Brustolini, Luis Felipe Lopes Costa, Marcos Vinícius Morais Moreira

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Periódicus · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A criminalização da homotransfobia representa um avanço para a pauta LGBTI+, no entanto, a proteção de quem é vítima de tal violência ainda está limitada a certo perfil e ignora realidades sociais relevantes que inviabilizam a concretização de seus objetivos. A partir de dados de registro de ocorrência coletados pela Polícia Civil do Rio de Janeiro, do Instituto de Segurança Pública, do Rio Sem Homofobia e do Grupo Arco Íris, que foram sistematizados pela Aliança Nacional LGBTI, busca-se compreender algumas lacunas deixadas pela aplicação da lei que criminaliza o racismo e esses casos, assim como os impasses ainda existentes para a efetiva proteção de pessoas LGBTI+ por agentes públicos. Utiliza-se uma abordagem jurídico-sociológica a partir da teoria queer, decolonial e transfeminista. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Homotransfobia. Criminalização. Cistema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it