Performance of Cooperative Detection in Joint Communication-Sensing Vehicular Network: A Data Analytic and Stochastic Geometry Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing complexity of urban environments introduces additional uncertainty to the deployment of the autonomous vehicular network. A novel road infrastructure cooperative detection model using Joint Communication and Sensing (JCS) technology is proposed in this article to simultaneously achieve high-efficient communication and obstacle detection for urban autonomous vehicles. To suppress the performance fluctuation caused by shadowing and obstruction to the JCS signals, we first derive the statistic of road obstacles from the Geographic Information System (GIS). Then, the analysis of JCS channel characteristics and shadowing factors are presented using Line-of-Sight and Non-Line-of-Sight (LoS and NLoS) channel models under the complex urban scenario. A stochastic geometry approach is applied to analyze the interference factors and the probability distribution of successful JCS detection and communication. Simulations have been made to verify the cooperative detection model by probability analysis based on LoS and NLoS channels, and the numerical results demonstrate several different optimization methods for the deployment of JCS road infrastructures. Finally, we simulated and analyzed a deployment optimization method for JCS road infrastructures that complied with the standard of urban traffic-spot structure placement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".