MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312820131 · doi:10.15581/016.47.14190

El principio de autonomía privada y sus consecuencias canónicas

2017· article· es· W4312820131 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Molano

Bibliographic record

VenueIus Canonicum · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerechoHumanitiesPolitical sciencePersonaGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este estudio se trata de la autonomía privada considerada como un principio general del derecho, y de su recepción en el derecho canónico. En consecuencia, se consideran las principales manifestaciones de la autonomía privada en el derecho canónico, basadas en el ejercicio de algunos deberes y derechos de los fieles; en particular, el derecho de reunión y de asociación, el deber y derecho al apostolado, y su complemento institucional: el derecho a promover y sostener aquellas iniciativas apostólicas que son propias de todos los fieles. El nuevo estatuto jurídico de los fieles ha hecho necesario que el legislador haya buscado también los recursos institucionales para que esas iniciativas puedan llevarse a cabo. Es así como ha surgido un nuevo tipo de personas jurídicas: las llamadas por el Código "personas jurídicas privadas". A través de ellas, los fieles pueden promover asociaciones y fundaciones autónomas con su libre iniciativa, cuyo régimen jurídico se rige por la autonomía privada de los fieles, y da lugar a un auténtico derecho privado canónico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIus CanonicumSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207