MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312821718 · doi:10.33921/onai9138

More Than Oneself: Cultural Values as Predictors of Happiness

2022· article· en· W4312821718 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nicolas Peter Jakowiec, Kenneth M. Cramer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and Identity · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHappinessIndividualismPer capitaUncertainty avoidanceGross domestic productPsychologySocial psychologyHofstede's cultural dimensions theorySubjective well-beingIndulgenceCollectivismEconomicsDemographySociologyPolitical scienceEconomic growthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study analyzed whether cultural values, such as individualism, foster lesser or greater degrees of happiness and to what degree the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita moderated such interaction. Data were compared across 82 nations according to their World Happiness Report scores, GDP per capita, and Hofstede dimensional scores. It was hypothesized (1) that high levels of national individualism would be positively correlated to happiness at a national level, (2) that other cultural dimensions would be relevant in predicting national happiness, (3) and that the association between happiness and cultural factors would be moderated by GDP per capita. Results indicated that individualism is correlated with higher happiness. Additional quantitative analyses showed that happiness was predicted by individualism, indulgence, long- term orientation, and power distance. Implications of these findings and future research directions are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and IdentitySame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207