MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EEG-Based integrated solution for drivers and safe transportation

2022· article· en· W4312825192 on OpenAlexafffund
Youssef Ahmed, Hossam A. Gabbar, Jing Ren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsElectroencephalographyComputer scienceKey (lock)AnxietyInterface (matter)Brain activity and meditationCognitionBrain–computer interfaceHuman–computer interactionPsychologyComputer securityNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electroencephalography (EEG) is used to evaluate and diagnose several brain disorders. An EEG system measures and records fluctuations in brain activity and can display substantial neuron activity that correlates with human activities such as mental fatigue, depression, anxiety, stress, and even cognitive load. This research proposes an integrated EEG-assisted performance monitoring system, as a solution for drivers and high-efficiency driving. The measure of changes in brain waves allows us to assess complexities faced by operators and motorists in order to achieve their respective objectives at the highest level of efficiency. With mental fatigue and cognitive load being the two core features recorded by the EEG, the system is able to assess and analyse the raw EEG data through the user interface and provide key performance indicators in vehicle operators. Once the analysis of key performance indicators has been made and able to map the human brain signals which will be translated into human behavior assessment. Furthermore, the system integrated the results and found the limits of human capabilities, prior to any accident or reaching critical conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207