MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312835454 · doi:10.46692/9781529213621.003

How Central Europeans Became Eastern European

2022· other· en· W4312835454 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyAncient historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the previous chapter, I examined a tendency to blame Central European inability to catch up with the West, not on the way Western-dominated economic and political structures were introduced in the area, but on an alleged cultural difference between West and East in Europe. The West is said to be culturally predisposed to freedom and democracy, and the East not. This mechanism for racializing Eastern Europe's alleged failure includes work by academics who argue that an unbridgeable East– West gap has existed in Europe centuries before the fall of communism. In the 1990s, some of them came to entertain a thought that had never occurred to Churchill, namely, that the Iron Curtain he saw in his famous 1946 speech descending across the continent only replaced an imagined divide of a much longer date, possibly going back to the eighteenth century and the Enlightenment. These scholars were quick to give the academic imprimatur to the litany of complaints about the eternal and intractable backwardness of Eastern European culture. While economists discussed the postcommunist region as one of the world's ‘emerging markets’, what these historians and social scientists saw emerge was an iceberg of obscurantism re-emerging, having been partly kept underwater by communist oppression. But ‘Eastern Europe’, as a uniform, culturally distinctive, and socially and politically inferior area, was not invented in the eighteenth century. Nor in the nineteenth. If it was, it was not known to a British traveller like the soldier and priest George Robert Gleig, who in the 1830s described the average labourer in early nineteenth-century Bohemia (now Czech Republic) as better off than an Englishman of comparable social station, and considered the political heritage of Bohemia to be superior to that of Germany (though no match for the superior state of liberty in England). Prague provided him with ‘the pomp and splendour of a great capital’, except for the unparalleled squalor of its Jewish Town. No, the invention of ‘Eastern Europe’ in the form that we know it did not yet happen, either in the Enlightenment, as some scholars claim, or in the 19th century, as do others. It is of much more recent vintage, essentially produced in the Cold War, and only getting more intense after it. But to demonstrate that, we need to examine both of these proposed dates of origin carefully.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207