Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В число находок из раскопок храма у села Веселое входят немногочисленные осколки стеклянных подвесных ламп. Их изучение позволило восстановить форму с горлом в виде раструба, округлым туловом и маленькими петлевидными ручками с характерным креплением. Лампы находят аналогии IX-XI вв. на территории Ирана, Сирии и Египта. Это согласуется со временем функционирования храма в третьей четверти IX - первой половине XI в. Находки из Веселого показывают, что рассмотренные лампы освещали не только мечети, но и христианские храмы, которые в Северо-Восточном Причерноморье появились под влиянием византийской культуры. The finds from excavations of a church near the Veseloe village include a small number of sherds from glass hanging lamps. Their examination provided an opportunity to reconstruct their form. The lamps have a bell-shaped neck, a round body and small loop handles with a distinctive holding. The Veseloe lamps find analogies among similar items from Iran, Syria and Egypt. This fact is consistent with the time of the church functioning which falls within the third quarter of the 9th century - first half of the 11th century. The finds from Veseloe demonstrate that the lamps in question were used to illuminate not only mosques but also Christian churches which appeared under the influence of Byzantine culture in the Northeastern Pontic region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it