Analisis Bahasa Anak pada Usia 2 Tahun dari Aspek Fonologi, Morfologi, Sintaksis, dan Semantik
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mother tongue is the first language mastered by humans since the beginning of their life through interaction with fellow members of the language community, such as family and the environmental community. This shows that the first language is an initial process obtained by children in recognizing sounds and symbols called language. The process of language acquisition also develops with increasing age of children, from months of age to years of age, but what is discussed in this study is the age of 2 years 6 months in which the language process has begun to be clearly seen in the vocabulary spoken by the child. This study aims to determine the language acquisition of children aged 2 years 6 months at the level of phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics. This research is expected to be one of the information materials in terms of research on language acquisition. The research method used in this research is a qualitative method with a case study approach. Through this qualitative method, the fathian phonetic system will be described at the age of 2 years and 6 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".