MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312877292 · doi:10.36647/ijsem/09.03.a002

Impact of Coronavirus on Insurance sector in India

2022· article· en· W4312877292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kamalpreet Kaur, Anil Chandhok

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Science Engineering and Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInsurance and Financial Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness interruption insuranceBusinessLife insuranceLivelihoodQuarter (Canadian coin)Insurance industryEarningsProperty insuranceVariety (cybernetics)Income protection insuranceGeneral insuranceEconomic growthFinanceInsurance policyAgricultureEconomicsActuarial scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown have impacted practically every industry and sector in the world, including the coverage quarter, which contributes significantly to the country's GDP and financial development. After the year 2000, India's insurance industry had a significant increase, and it's now separated into two main categories: life insurance and non-existence insurance. Each industry is governed by the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India (IRDAI). The insurance industry aims to protect a country's citizens, assets, and organisations. Because life insurance aims to protect people's livelihoods and future profits, it has a direct link to people's earnings, business performance, and net well worth. In addition to routinely occurring economic activities, well-known insurance protects property and corporations and their values. It is affecting to the US of America’s variety one, secondary economic sectors and company sectors. This research paper identifies the effect of coronavirus on coverage place in India and the operational disturbing conditions faced through the coverage enterprise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Science Engineering and ManagementSame topicInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207