Diplopia in a patient with Satoyoshi syndrome and mitochondrial myopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INtroductIoNThe diagnostic work-up in patients with ocular motility impairment requires taking a detailed history with a focus on both ophthalmic and systemic conditions.A complete ophthalmic and strabismological examination is necessary.In addition, patients with diplopia often need a referral for laboratory tests, imaging examinations, and consultations with other medical specialists.Both physicians referring patients to strabismology outpatient clinics and diplopic patients themselves may not link their ophthalmic abnormalities with systemic diseases.This case report serves to highlight that diplopia may be caused by rare disorders.The diagnostic process in diplopic patients must be oriented towards determining the cause of the condition and followed by the selection of an appropriate treatment modality.In most cases, effective treatment of the underlying disease or reducing the severity of symptoms can help the patient.The variable nature of the disorder with intermittent periods of more severe diplopia and remission usually indicate non-ophthalmic causes.The aim of this article is to highlight the complex etiology of visual disorders based on a case report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".