Raconter l’histoire du coup d’État depuis les poblaciones : le témoignage inédit d’une religieuse française à Santiago (Chili, 1973-1974)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 11 septembre 1973, Nadine Loubet, connue au Chili comme Sœur Odile, est confrontée au coup d’État militaire des Forces armées du général Pinochet. Le président socialiste du gouvernement d’Unité populaire, Salvador Allende, est retrouvé mort. Une intense répression s’abat sur la gauche chilienne. La dominicaine française prend alors la plume pour raconter l’horreur et documenter les exactions dans des carnets manuscrits, rédigés au jour le jour pendant un peu plus d’un an. Établie en secteurs populaires comme religieuse ouvrière, Nadine Loubet participe également aux actions de résistance qui s’organisent dans les poblaciones pour venir en aide aux personnes persécutées par le nouveau régime. Cinquante plus tard, ses carnets constituent une source inédite pour comprendre les conséquences du coup d’État dans les quartiers périphériques de Santiago mais aussi prendre la mesure de l’invisibilisation des témoignages féminins issus de l’Église.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".