Vologda’s Seventeenth Century Tale of Tsar Ivan Vasilievich, a Newly Discovered Source for the Ivan Slobodsky Chronicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the study of a previously unknown example of Vologda literature Tale of Tsar Ivan Vasilievich. The Tale came down to us as a part of chronicle-chronographic compilation of the last quarter of the 17th century, created on the basis of the Moscow list of the 2nd Edition of Russian Chronograph with the continuation. In 1716 the text of the Tale became the basis of Ivan Slobodsky’s Chronicle articles about the stay of tsar Ivan IV in Vologda during the oprichnina. The author is inclined to connect the appearance of the Tale with the activity of the Vologda Archbishop Gavriil Kichigin. The article argues in favor of the non-Vologodsky origin of compiler of the literary monument — he most likely was a visiting Moscow scribe. The Appendix publishes the text of the Vologda’s Tale and the fragment of the Patriarchal Chronicle of the 1680s, placed in the manuscript after the text of the Russian Chronograph.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".