MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312905895 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.386

The Role of Environmental Factors in the Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem: A Literature Review

2022· review· en· W4312905895 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob shop schedulingIntersection (aeronautics)Computer scienceEnergy consumptionScheduling (production processes)Operations researchManagement scienceIndustrial engineeringEngineeringOperations managementTransport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem (FJSP) has been extensively studied due to its importance in manufacturing. However, as a consequence of the increasing environmental issues, the FJSP has been modified to tackle these crucial problems. This article presents a literature review focusing on the FJSP and its intersection with environmental strategies (i.e., energy consumption, carbon emission and noise). Articles are classified according to each environmental consideration and their solution methods. This work highlights potential research areas and serves as a starting point for developing future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it