TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMANFAATAN FUNGSI RUANG DI KAWASAN BY PASS KOTA KENDARI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemanfaatan kawasan By Pass Kota Kendari, Menurut Rencana Teknik Ruang Kota (RTRK) Kota Kendari dan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang Mengakibatkan pemanfaatan Ruang dikawasan By Pass tidak sesuai dengan Rencana Teknik Ruang Kota (RTRK) Kota Kendari. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kendari bertempat di Kawasan By Pass, Kecamatan Mandonga, Kota Kendari. Metode penelitian ini dilakukan secara Normatif Empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pemanfaatan fungsi ruang tidak sesuai Rencana Teknik Ruang Kota (RTRK). Hal ini disebabkan karena pemanfaatan fungsi ruang di kawasan By pass Saat ini telah didominasi oleh bangunan permanen seperti Pertokoan dan Hotel bahkan SPBU dan Mesjid di teluk Kota Kendari. Sedangkan berdasarkan ketentuan-ketentuan yang ada pada Rencana Teknik Ruang Kota (RTRK) fungsi utamanya adalah Wisma Tambak. Keadaan ini disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor antara lain faktor ekonomi, sosial, politik. terutama kawasan By Pass Yang sangat strategis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".