World Federation of Athletic Training and Therapy World Congress 2022 Peer-Reviewed Track Abstracts, May 5–7, 2022, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context: Recent research has highlighted changes in neurocognitive and central nervous system function among some of the most common injuries, particularly in those with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Functional performance tests (FPT) like the side-hop test (SHT) are often used to assess physical performance, however, minimally stress a patient's neurocognitive function. On the contrary, dual-tasking is often used to assess the interplay between physical and neurocognitive performance, however, these traditional laboratory tasks are minimally challenging on higher-level athletes. Modifying and adding a reactive component to an already proven FPT may provide clinicians with increased insight into neurocognitive performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was two-fold, to validate a choice-reaction hop test (CRHT) by assessing differences in timing versus the SHT, and to determine the CRHT's test-retest reliability. We hypothesized that the CRHT would take longer to complete than the SHT and it would demonstrate good test-retest reliability.Methods: Fourteen physically active (>90 minutes of physical activity/week) participants (5 female/9 male, 24.5±3.6 years old, 174.2±9.3 cm, 74.4±16.3 kg) with a range of ankle injury history completed the study. Participants were initially screened and completed injury history questionnaires followed by two hop tests in a randomized order. For the SHT, participants performed 20 hops on a single limb medially and laterally over a 30-cm distance as quickly as possible. For the CRHT participants similarly hopped on an instrumented mat 20 times on a single limb medially and laterally over a 30-cm distance, however, participants had to react to one of two squares on each side randomly indicated by flashing lights on a computer screen. Participants completed 3 trials of each hop test in a counterbalanced order. Participants returned one-week later to repeat the CRHT. To validate the CRHTs neurocognitive component, a paired t-test between the SHT and the CRHT was conducted. To assess the test-retest reliability of the CRHT, an ICC using a 2-way, random effects model for consistency of average measures was computed between day 1 and 2.Results: Participants took significantly longer to complete the CRHT (22.1±3.8s) compared to the traditional SHT (10.4±2.0s, p<0.001). The CRHT demonstrated good-excellent test-retest reliability across testing days (r=0.873, p<0.001).Conclusions: Compared to the SHT, the CRHT took significantly longer to complete indicating its ability to stress neurocognitive function during an FPT. The CRHT also demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability, which may allow it to be a useful measure in serial evaluations such as during rehabilitation benchmarking. The CRHT may be an effective FPT to assess combined physical and neurocognitive function to assist clinicians in evidence-based decision making. Future research needs to assess differences in the CRHT in those with CAI versus healthy control participants to further validate its clinical utility.Context: The biopsychosocial model (BPS) has allowed healthcare professionals like Athletic Therapists/Trainers to holistically examine patients, through the integration of biological, psychological, and social factors, addressing the complexity of pain and disability during musculoskeletal injury. Despite clinician's knowledge on the importance of the BPS model, especially in chronic pain, a biomedical approach to overall Athletic Training and Therapy education and clinical practice still exists.Objective: to establish what Graduate Certified Athletic Therapists perceptions are on the importance of the Biopsychosocial Model in overall patient management within clinical practice? Secondly, examining what are Graduate Certified Athletic Therapists views on the Biopsychosocial Model in their undergraduate educational curriculum in Athletic Therapy?Study Design: Cross-sectional study using an online survey was implemented.Patients or Other Participants: 133 Athletic Therapists/Trainers completed the survey (completion rate = 89%).Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants completed demographic, Biopsychosocial Model in Practice and Biopsychosocial Model in College/University Curriculum questions. The 14-item survey used a combination of multiple choice and Likert scale questions. Descriptive statistics characterised the participants; reliability/internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, Chi Squared tests explored the relationships between BPS model and patient care and education. Spearman's Correlation assessed the relationships between Athletic Therapists/Trainers perceptions of BPS and patient care. Mann Whitney U identified the differences between BPS, sex, and education.Results: There was a very strong positive correlation between implementation and the importance of the BPS model in patient management (r= 0.729, n=133, p<0.000). A positive correlation was found between confidence levels and implementation of the BPS model in patient management (r= 0.364, n=133, p<0.000). A weaker but positive correlation was found between confidence levels and effectiveness in incorporating the BPS model on patient outcomes (r= 0.264, n=133, p<0.002). Descriptive statistics showed 82.7% of participants viewed BPS as very important, 71.4% reported very strong implementation with patients, while 56.4% of participants were very confident in their knowledge of the BPS model. A significant difference was found in the understanding of BPS model based on third level education in Athletic Therapists/Trainers and the transferrable skills of the BPS in clinical practice, U = 1208.000, z= -4.425, p = 0.00, r = 0.383. Descriptive statistics showed 61.7% of participants viewed having inadequate transferable skills of the BPS model to a clinical setting, where 27.8% of participants agreed that knowledge of the BPS model was important to ATs and that their educational curriculum was adequate. The survey was assessed for reliability, Cronbach's α score of 0.729.Conclusion: Graduate Athletic Therapists positively view the importance of Biopsychosocial model in patient management, which will enhance clinical practice and patient outcome measures. However, the transferability of BPS from educational curriculum into clinical practice could be further enhanced and developed. Shifting educational curriculum from biomedical focus to a Biopsychosocial model is needed across all Athletic Therapy/ Training programs.Context: All Canadian based members of the Canadian Athletic Therapists Association (CATA) are required to be members of a regional association (RA). The CATA Board of Directors presented a bylaw change eliminating this requirement. This announcement was unexpected by many members, resulting in varied opinions. The Bylaw change has many implications, such as the role of the CATA and RA, membership fee changes, and questioning the value of memberships. The purpose of this research was to explore these issues, and gauge membership opinions of the value of the CATA and RAs.Methods: An online-based survey was targeted to members of the CATA through RAs in Canada, social media, and snowball sampling. Reminders were sent through the same channels, and the survey was open for 1 month. The survey consisted of 50 questions including demographic data detailing membership status, RA affiliation, and membership length. We included questions about membership value and knowledge about association work. Data were tabulated and analysed for national and regional trends and differences. Primary analysis suggested examining Ontario members' opinions as a unique group.Results: Of 682 participants completed the and were Certified participants were as and members were in the The participants were of ATs the CATA of national for the than of the membership the RA but that value increased to the was of members the RA on for but were the RA to of members value the but of RA members this of members value their RA, while this to for RA is value with CATA and RA but is a strong between members of the and RA an important for many members, is viewed by members across the is the of the The of members the opinions of the national This survey was completed with the of understanding membership knowledge and to all members of the CATA and The is of value the bylaw A membership survey questions be completed Recent from that one in will one by the and is one in a an of this across This study to examine the of injury and a in the same among and data are from a study including from and to We used injury that included a demographic and of and using the or and a injury by a study All the to complete a or from were All with a were to a and was based on the most on in We identified participants with a that returned to within the and reported the confidence for by of with a injury or in the same and the of days to injury. to assess differences between and were using for by Of the and in this and a injury the of their The days to injury was for and for 50 and a The days to was for and for and in the of a injury or An 1 in and 1 in a injury within the same a significant differences were identified between and be with to the of in this are used in the of would a for in the of a many it challenging to these on each the by history which is to changes in performance. The purpose of this study is to provide a as a for by between the of years in testing which included and testing was in to the of by an in test Outcome data for and and was by of Descriptive data are as and A compared the outcomes based the of reported A significant difference was for = = = and = significant differences were found for based of testing significant differences between and 3 differences were for of than The outcomes the of for history in athletes. healthcare professionals data to data as history is into and may the Future research data in than 3 The while was to had 3 or in a for as the of is and which the and management of those for healthcare having a measure for each is the and required to tests for all is Therefore, having to a will provide healthcare professionals a to a The purpose of this study is to provide data as a for of and than between the of years in computer based and was as a measure of were in a to the of All testing was by an Athletic in test Outcome data for and and was by and for all participants are as and A was used to determine difference in outcomes based differences were found = = = = and = was used to determine the of the differences between multiple significant differences were between each for each An t-test found significant differences between = = = = by are is important that healthcare professionals the to data in as are differences between and between in and are a clinical in and healthy that the of pain and the of the differences in within a and The purpose of the study was to examine in the of the in those with and during to determine differences in the of healthy participants were assessed for using the had and had Participants completed of of the were to determine while of the and was using within was during and for each A was for each in each resulting in to examine the of and is as a of from to A significant was found for = = was in each with differences of p = for p = for and p = for of was significant for = = but A significant was found for = = was in and with differences of p = and p = of was significant for = = and = significant were found for or during or of in the was in of compared to which may to in in with Future research is needed to determine of of the is with in and the of within a be and by targeted rehabilitation to and the of are among the most common for of care such as and professionals resulting in an for The however, is with in patient or and of healthcare For is a of consistency and with to by This in a of that to be the care level clinical patient and of care. care provide on practice and to in practice across the of while times and healthcare of the of a of and implementation of a The initially were and and were to in of were to and across 1 and using Data survey 3 using the was for a care for the and of the and This is to provide a approach for in care. This of a clinical for and for and of or for physical and and for clinical of this was an and of the The is a to of care across and that the of care and from management and This is also by the and The and and are important for understanding the and of and during This study to examine injury and during the and determine for injury This is a study using data from and by from the All were by two with based on the and and the on for and of data on injury and in were with the research All were included in this with confidence were for and by based on as or to during the The of all are also unique 1 in There were of which were identified as or to during the and The with the of and and and Despite many of the resulting in many to of injury of injury 1 in one injury during the The on for and of data with and on to and injury but these to be the reliability of injury and and The was to and may increased of limb injury. The correlation of and physical levels has however, the correlation between physical levels and a that and injury has The purpose was to the correlation between the and physical levels in We a study to injury a used to participants from and We using the which is a and that of skills hop and two to one hop and and hop and each with for a score of physical and in this study were as of the study using We computed a correlation with confidence and an level of to study the correlation between the and physical We the physical levels by adding the of physical physical education and completed the tests male, years = = The in physical and for a of than minutes for of the between and minutes for of the and that minutes for of the The of was and the correlation between physical and was positive = and significant = with the is a positive correlation between and physical an injury approach to is to physical on the of skills to be by with may to increased and confidence that may to increased physical The provide to assist in with physical including and may in injuries, which may performance. to performance, and data two and are with increased and and and this was to performance outcomes in with and This study their history The was used to performance in a clinical research The is a testing and that including the to to and compared outcomes between history to data were performed using The overall score significantly between those with and The times to were significantly in those with history compared to those history times to were significantly in with history compared to those history were significantly in a history compared to those with history had significantly overall than those with a history We performance outcomes in with a outcomes a ability to change focus between and and a range of to and and to in to these may to performance and to the history with performance data may into rehabilitation and for their with a are of a injury. is reported to injury like However, it is with a to This study the between and in was hypothesized with a would demonstrate in this study. Participants completed a single and a analysis while instrumented with a a participants completed practice over a with Participants were to a that was or were to the The average during the practice was as the for the data Participants trials over the a of trials were for the and the within of data were using a system and data were and were the and 20 and were to and using a compared the between rate and average rate while for using Correlation was as and very strong from A significant was between and p significant relationships were between and the r p with a was with but were significant relationships between and or of are a of injury in with a participants to the may to injury reported in with using is and however, has assessed for but has research has the reliability and of purpose was to the reliability and of and with or We hypothesized that would be and study included healthy participants completed two one and were assessed on days using the and data were using of testing was randomized among and and between the two An was used as the two were randomly on one of the the was during the Participants completed for each and rate of were for each A was used for and the with the was as test-retest reliability of and were with Correlation was assessed using between the and were as good or We reliability of for all with and We relationships between and We reliability of for all with and and relationships between and is a for assessing and and using are the for assessing and the is and or may be used as an to for assessing and and in the or 1 research has identified a of in healthcare professionals are to and This a for to about and management, while also could be to enhance care. to these an as the educational The purpose of this was to explore the of this within a of CATA the completed an online that explored perceptions about using for and about the educational The also included questions to on to such a within Descriptive statistics were for all questions from 1 = to = while were for the an for using as a of their Participants agreed with the that used the and with to is agreed or agreed with the using the and it to their about the of care also reported that the was to and was for their knowledge important also from the questions. an for the of and as it was that these important are often in online educational The of participants also this within a where the complete the questions and in a with their The from this study demonstrated that the was to be an effective by the of by the of care. Participants also the for the to be within with with Future research be by to explore of to such an in educational There is as to the and of of the and for found during the that were than and to the of patient reported outcome is this or in of The purpose of this study was to assess during an in of a measure of of cm, kg) were assessed with = = = A performance was completed including of in the and of an were completed on the The was completed during were completed with limb and test as and as a limb limb during the was to the limb in but or p = limb p = in in p = limb p = or p = limb p For across all was difference p and difference p was of on were and the minimally important difference in to difference p = but difference p = in are in with versus or and these may be in or during the research is required to these are a of the or the between and of of are important component of which may be by This explored the to such changes in among We hypothesized over the would a of and which will instability A control study was completed with a of with days between Participants were based on a between the and data with a Participants performed one of with open on Participants a in testing days of injury. on the was during the testing were into a Participants were in the had completed performance testing to the The of and limb were from the and to assess the of and limb was used to of in and Participants had or that of the were from the An analysis of on and measures was and were the and measures were There were significant differences in = and = between the in = and = between There was of in = and = or in = and = for in and in a has on these measures which has clinical in this test may be conducted. research is required to to of and those The to which injury are in is to in these To an effective and for knowledge of and the of is The of this study was to establish the in in of all in completed an online survey using the A survey was from an survey and for and by injury The survey was by Outcome measures included in of and of to and ability to an were also Data were analysed using statistics and Mann Whitney U tests were used to differences between than 1 in an in Of those an with an or an The most of included and were to an in while in would the of among of were for those of knowledge to an were of an were to an than those were with a Despite a strong to in than 1 in This may be an for injury However, the a of knowledge to and that a may be a significant of in each Certified in a role in healthcare and with evidence-based to injury Canadian knowledge and healthcare are This study and management across practice clinical based on years of clinical and and knowledge among Canadian We ATs would with clinical and education would demonstrate and ATs would adequate Canadian ATs were members of the Canadian Athletic Therapists Association (CATA) were to complete a survey study. ATs reported their the of assessed the and and knowledge using a was based on Descriptive statistics were used to with and confidence were to examine the between the of two and clinical and education.Results: The rate was years clinical The of ATs had a and care The of ATs in a were the most and neurocognitive testing was the used and were used by and of ATs with a had of than those with a and clinical with for for using was the most common of ATs were for was adequate among ATs and of to questions with However, indicated an would be allowed to to the reported Canadian ATs demonstrated but with or Canadian Canadian ATs to to and and of including among is with reported between on level of sex, and to pain but will for and to pain, to in and physical as as reported in the it is to that and and important in The purpose of the study was to what Canadian about and as as the of such A purpose was to understanding of where their knowledge as as that may to in an Athletic Therapy as as of from over the of within their were sent a survey their and social was by and were for a focus to determine their to knowledge of and were completed from with all in the focus indicated that knowledge to including with most of their knowledge from curriculum as as of the indicated that by and to provide Data analysis between with with and with with athletes. reported to provide with as as reported knowledge and the that the to to within their and is within the of however, and reported that were to an is were of to the with a to provide is that as as clinical the and and management of Athletic were in and in Canadian Athletic Therapists Association (CATA) in The is to education in and was required to this of the in had many of the that were in but for these to the CATA There is understanding of Certified Athletic knowledge of the in of CATA were required to this to Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish the knowledge and of in to practice The and was to survey the CATA membership as a measure of their The was to measure and of the knowledge are reported in this An of the was in and sent an to the CATA membership = where members = were to in the The study was by the Board members or of the CATA membership the survey male, to of survey had a had a and had an undergraduate among the knowledge from to with an overall of The rate was a significant that the The of members that a in is the of each that in this study may the However, the knowledge score of for in knowledge for Canadian these were to be of the Future research to measure knowledge educational is a However, the and the of to during is a for function. with and may be to the study the between and measures of and physical function across among We a survey among years of with a with completed a and which were used to and For were into with the and in a completed measures of and to assess and physical pain and outcomes were from Likert and to indicated the of and their with each outcome using and confidence by was for outcome effects were was with pain and There were between and or physical function was with all outcomes with score change as to the the had the and of while the and had the most outcomes with but demonstrated and was was a for overall and physical function in this Future research and physical measures than outcomes to the effects of Certified in and management Therefore, it is important for ATs to with evidence-based and management and to their To healthcare and knowledge are This study and management across all practice based on years of clinical and and knowledge among We hypothesized ATs increased clinical and education would with clinical practice, and adequate We a study among of all ATs in from the Athletic Therapy membership in ATs completed an online survey on their and measures and knowledge using a consisted of 20 and questions as was based on Descriptive statistics were to with and confidence were used to examine the between clinical and education.Results: On had years of clinical had a and and in their were the most while neurocognitive testing was the used and of ATs used a and The of a with education or clinical were the most used approach for and were for
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.221 | 0.074 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".