Predictive Biomarkers in the Management of Bladder Cancer: Perspectives in an Evolving Therapeutic Landscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with prognosis and therapeutic strategies highly dependent on tumor grade and stage. Predictive biomarkers of therapeutic response have been studied to guide selection of intravesical and/or systemic therapy. A predictive biomarker is measured before the start of treatment and provides information on the likelihood of response to a specific therapy. Many candidate predictive biomarkers for BC have been identified, but few have been rigorously validated or distinguished from simply having treatment-agnostic prognostic capacity. Identifying predictive biomarkers tailored to therapeutic mechanism of action has considerable implications for the sequencing of therapies, as well as bladder preservation strategies in advanced disease states. We evaluate predictive tissue-based, urine-based, and serum-based biomarkers across the spectrum of non–muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive BC and preview predictive biomarkers for emerging targeted therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".