Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates processes that include weaving, macramé, and needlework.The very nature of these practices requires devoted physical presence, firmly fixed for long hours to build rhythm.Labourious and tedious, these crafts bring one to the present by means of minute and constrained gestures.60 Research in Arts and Education | 2 / 2021 PLAYING SLOW Enduring the process at hand, the psyche is anxious and persistently apprehensive.Despite this, the work is undertaken with pleasure, entangling the practitioner such that she is unable to depart the site of labour.Touch and the repetitive working and reworking of materials allow for pleasure, enjoyment and being focused on the present moment.These lived experiences are what feminist scholar Anne Cvetkovich accredits to "the value of process and the art of daily living" through an "embodied practice."Drawing from feminist interpretations of Lacanian jouissance, this paper locates presence and attentiveness via slowness as a primary site of female creativity that differs.Both as a gesture of delaying and as being other, a play Derrida refers to as 'Différance' it is particularly generative for new ways of knowing.As a means of refinement that "work upon or shape" the practices of needlework, macramé and weaving can be understood as means of knowledge and ways of being in the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".