MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synchrophasor Assisted Power Swing Detection Scheme for Wind Integrated Transmission Network

2022· article· en· W4312946966 on OpenAlexaff
J. Tejeswara Rao, Bhavesh R. Bhalja, Mikhail Andreev, O.P. Malik

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorSwingElectric power systemWind powerReal Time Digital SimulatorVoltageComputer scienceElectric power transmissionFault (geology)EngineeringElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integration of wind-based renewable energy sources into long Extra High Voltage/Ultra High Voltage uncompensated/compensated power transmission network poses significant problems in terms of proper detection of power swings and effective discrimination between symmetrical faults and power swing situations. As the existing protection strategies are unable to detect the said circumstances, a novel technique, based on the difference between sending end and receiving end positive sequence currents angles of the transmission line, is proposed in this paper. The required data is collected with the help of Phasor Measurement Units placed on both sides of the line. The scheme results in effective discrimination between distinct faults and circumstances of asymmetrical/symmetrical power swing and achieves satisfactory outcome during current transformer saturation condition. The proposed algorithm is evaluated on the wind-integrated IEEE-9 bus system by producing power swings, various cases of faults, and faults during power swings. Validation of the suggested technique was carried out by the execution of hardware-inloop simulation on a Real-Time Digital Simulator. The achieved outcomes disclose higher sensitivity and better discriminating ability of the presented technique in comparison with those of numerous prevailing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207