MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312951007 · doi:10.2528/pierc22080606

Printed Fractal Folded Coplanar-strips-fed Array Rectenna for IoE Applications

2022· article· en· W4312951007 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress In Electromagnetics Research C · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRectennaSTRIPSFractal3d printedMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringComposite materialBiomedical engineeringMathematicsVoltageMathematical analysisRectification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a low-cost antenna integrable to a large set of indoor common building materials.Employing the printing technology on thin transparent polyethylene terephthalate material and using available building materials not only leads to a low-cost environmentally friendly solution for the expected massive sensor deployment but also eliminates the dispersive behavior of the materials that are interacting with them.A coplanar-strips fed fractal folded antenna element was designed and validated experimentally with four different materials including gypsum, plywood, and plexiglass.The aesthetically viable ground-free antenna achieves wideband performance and radiates in the broadside plane perpendicularly to the wall.The single antenna element covers the frequency band of 2.18-3.96GHz with a gain of 1 dBi at 2.4 GHz.To take advantage of the large available surface, a high efficiency 2.4 GHz array rectenna for powering electronic devices intended for IoE technology is proposed.The proposed array rectenna has a dimension of 384 × 354 × 6.475 mm 3 and employs a single diode as the rectifier element.The measured results for the presented array rectenna reveal an AC-DC powerconversion-efficiency (PCE) of more than 20% for input powers as low as 0.025 µW/cm 2 with a peak PCE of 61.3% at 4.03 µW/cm 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it