Fake News: o “espetáculo” como gênese das “notícias falsas”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En contraste con la comprensión de que las noticias falsas son solo la reversión de la “verdad”, la “verdad” que se ha convertido en mentira, “este artículo propone vincular la noción de “noticias falsas “a los desarrollos contemporáneos del concepto de espectáculo, presentado en 1967 por Guy Debord. Para hacerlo, el argumento se divide en tres puntos principales: la relación entre el espectáculo y la sociedad excitada, según formulado por Christoph Türcke (2010); la reducción del debate político a una política del efecto sujeto a los juegos de “Circulación de sí mismo”; finalmente, la consolidación de lo que Pierre Laval y Christian Dardot (2016) llaman “nueva razón en el mundo”, una racionalidad basada en una forma de subjetivación empresarial y narcisista. Lo que se espera demonstrar, en resumen, es que sin la reflexión sobre estas dimensiones, el debate sobre las noticias falsas se vuelve inocuo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".