Flexible Performance-Based Control for Nonlinear Systems Under Strong External Disturbances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Addressing external disturbances has been a critical issue for control design to ensure reliable operation of systems. This article investigates the tracking control problem for the uncertain nonlinear systems with the strong external disturbance and the prescribed performance. The flexible performance-based control scheme is developed by introducing an external disturbance criterion into the prescribed performance. It is capable of guaranteeing the prescribed performance if the external disturbance is less than a specified threshold and degrading that in light of the user-appointed rule otherwise. Particularly, the disturbance interval observer is synthesized to generate the boundaries of the external disturbances and realize the judgment of that criterion. With the generated boundaries, the interval-type auxiliary system is designed to provide the modified performance functions (MPFs) that characterize performance requirement and degradation rule simultaneously. Based on the positive system theory and the Lyapunov method, it is theoretically shown that the system output can always track the reference signal and satisfy the constraints of MPFs. Finally, both the numerical simulation and the application of flight control design verify that the results are effective and valid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".