MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312978720 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2022.0011

Blended Identities in American Photography

2022· article· en· W4312978720 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Earnestine Jenkins

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotographyIndigenousStudioVisual artsIdentity (music)PortraitWhite (mutation)Style (visual arts)Representation (politics)ArtClothingSubject (documents)NegativeHistoryArchaeologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blended Identities in American Photography Earnestine Jenkins (bio) In my private collection of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century photographs is an image of a young brown-skinned woman that raises questions about Black and Indigenous identities in America (fig. 1). The photograph is one of a set of five pictures taken in a professional photography studio. The photographs depict a Black family made up of three young adult males, two females, and a toddler with inquisitive large dark eyes. The same painted backdrop of draped curtains opening out onto a lush landscape, with an elaborate stand placed in front of the painted window, is apparent in three of the photographs. In separate images, the young women stand next to the same wooden chair in identical positions. The subjects are [End Page 20] Click for larger view View full resolution Fig 1. Photographic postcard portrait of a young woman dressed in Western and Indigenous clothing, early twentieth century. Courtesy of the author. fashionably attired in the contemporary suits, dresses, and hats characteristic of turn-of-the-century America. It is the younger woman (or younger sister?) who styled herself in a manner that suggests blended Black and Indigenous identities integrated into the family's representation of itself. It is her unique style of dress that, in the absence of any textual evidence of where the photographs were taken, points to a location in the American West. The visual documentation of race and ethnic identity in the photograph, combined with the subject's distinctive costume, guides my interpretation of this portrait. Although the artifact is a photographic postcard dating from the turn of the twentieth century, it references a history of contact between Indigenous people and people of African descent dating back to the eras of "discovery," exploration, and colonization in the so-called New World. These [End Page 21] intersectional histories remain largely invisible. The photographic image likely references the history of the Indian Freedmen once enslaved by the Choctaw, Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole peoples. During the 1830s, Black people were forced to evacuate the Southeast, accompanying Native American slaveholders on the Trail of Tears to Indian territory out West (Krauthamer 38–39). Upon arrival, Indigenous peoples rebuilt their communities; they established their nations anew with Black enslaved labour, crushed slave resistance with violence, and sided with the Confederacy during the Civil War. This history of entanglement, characterized by both conflict and cooperation, endured throughout Reconstruction and the advent of the Jim Crow era. After the Civil War, Black regiments made up of veterans of the conflict between the states helped settle the western frontier, participating in most of the major military campaigns that conquered the Plains Indians and forced them onto reservations (Viola 53). During the late nineteenth century, the federally appointed Dawes Commission began documenting individuals of Native American ancestry (Walton-Raji 82). The most extensive of such genealogical records, the Dawes Commission's list included individuals and families of mixed Black and Indigenous heritage. Government authorities usually excluded applicants with Black Indian ancestry from the list, while those with European lineage were accepted on the rolls and identified as "Indian." Such was the nineteenth-century historical context in which blood and cultural ties were shared between African Americans and Indigenous people in the South and in Indian territories out West. This unique photograph is a testament to how such convoluted histories of identity are rarely visualized in American art and visual culture. It documents Indigenous women's histories of clothing and distinctive styles of dress following colonization. Government boarding schools for Indian students trained girls to sew as part of a broader civilizing mission, providing them with survival skills appropriate for domestic servitude (Gordon 27). They would return to reservations prepared to run households and Americanize others, a federal agenda that instilled subordination in Indigenous children (Gordon 4). Sewing classes instructed girls in making Western clothing, such as shirtwaists, skirts, aprons, and dresses. Numerous photographs from the early twentieth century show Indigenous women sewing while dressed in Western clothing. By this time, home sewing was a significant part of everyday life for women in America, across ethnic, racial and class differences. Millions of American women...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207