Impact of Marketing Strategy on the Competitiveness of Tourism and Hotel Businesses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relevance of the study is conditioned by the need to analyse modern marketing theory and its provisions and systematise current methods of marketing promotion of travel companies. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to develop an algorithm for creating a marketing strategy for a tourist and hotel business enterprise, describe the process of identifying competitors, disclose parameters for assessing the competitiveness of tourist and hotel business enterprises, systematise strategies for increasing demand during periods of low demand for tourist services, list elements of a modern marketing strategy for the development of tourist and hotel business enterprises, present the main characteristics of brand positioning in the market. The main approach in the study is the method of system analysis, which was used to consider a complex system of relationships between marketing strategy and the effectiveness of the tourism business. In addition, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: synthesis, deduction, classification, data grouping, comparison, generalisation, and analysis of information sources. The study presents the results of the analysis, developed an algorithm for creating a marketing strategy for a tourist and hotel business enterprise, described the process of identifying competitors, identified the parameters for assessing the competitiveness of tourist and hotel business enterprises, systematised strategies for increasing demand during periods of low demand for tourist services, listed elements of a modern marketing strategy for the development of tourist and hotel business enterprises, presents the main characteristics of brand positioning in the market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it