Chaos Game Optimization Algorithm for Parameters Identification of Different Models of Photovoltaic Solar Cell and Module
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to achieve the optimum feasible efficiency, the electrical parameters of the photovoltaic solar cell and module should always be thoroughly researched. In reality, the quality of PV designs can have a significant impact on PV system dynamic modeling and optimization. PV models and calculated parameters, on the other hand, have a major effect on MPPT and production system efficiency. Because a solar cell is represented as the most significant component of a PV system, it should be precisely modeled. For determining the parameters of solar PV modules and cells, the Chaos Game Optimization (CGO) method has been presented for the Single Diode Model (SDM). A set of the measured I-V data has been considered for the studied PV design and applied to model the RTC France cell, and Photowatt-PWP201 module. The objective function in this paper is the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) between the measured and identified datasets of the proposed algorithm. The optimal results that have been obtained by the CGO algorithm for five electrical parameters of PV cell and model have been compared with published results of various optimization algorithms mentioned in the literature on the same PV systems. The comparison proved that the CGO algorithm was superior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".