MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313016064 · doi:10.32972/dms.2022.023

Mechanical simulation of spring-based tube compensator

2022· article· en· W4313016064 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Trautmann, Attila Piros, Balázs Komáromi

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign of Machines and Structures · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
Canadian institutionsIron Ore Company (Canada)
FundersNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
KeywordsSpring (device)Tube (container)Computer scienceFinite element methodMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article deals with the examination of a new product family of tube holders. FEA analysis and analytical calculation also provided information on displacements due to force. The article introduces a simplified mathematical model to substitute the compli-cated numeric simulations. The results have shown that appropriate calculations are accu-rate and can replace the simulation of fully detailed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDesign of Machines and StructuresSame topicMechanical and Thermal Properties AnalysisFrench-language works237,207