MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313039405 · doi:10.29173/ijcc15

New Journal for a New Era

2022· article· en· W4313039405 on OpenAlexaff
Ged Williams, Elizabeth Papathanassoglou, Patricia Zrelak

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Critical Care · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAFERPublic relationsHealth carePandemicPolitical scienceMedicineEngineering ethicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)EngineeringLawComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critical care practice has never been more impactful than it is today. On the back of the worst pandemic in over 100 years, critical care clinicians are being exemplified as people who save and restore lives every day in communities worldwide, as never before. It is important to maintain a long-lasting and robust focus on the vital contribution of critical care practice in the health and wellbeing of each community and nation globally and to share our intellectual and practical resources to ensure a better and safer future for all.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0070.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3050.184

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.518
Teacher spread0.428 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Critical CareSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207