MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313052989 · doi:10.1145/3570773.3570779

Prediction of Phosphorylation Sites in Amino Acid Sequences Using Convolutional Neural Networks

2022· article· en· W4313052989 on OpenAlex
Yanchun Zeng, Lambert Yan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorylationConvolutional neural networkCascadeComputational biologyProtein phosphorylationComputer scienceKinaseArtificial intelligenceBiochemistryBioinformaticsProtein kinase ABiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this research project is to predict the location of phosphorylation on human proteins by their amino acid sequences. Signals are sent into cells through receptors during a process called signaling cascade, which may alter the state of cells. One essential element of signaling cascade is protein kinases, which are enzymes that give the target protein a phosphate group. They can activate, deactivate proteins or act as signals to be passed onto other proteins. Through the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), our model aims to provide a plausible prediction of the phosphorylation pattern of a given human protein sequence, on which future experiments can be based.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207