MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313059986 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v16i3.573

First Case of COVID-19 N501Y Variant of Concern Infection in a Patient with Chronic HIV Infection

2021· article· en· W4313059986 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Wen Qing Ye, Joanne Britto, John Neary, Mark Crowther

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PneumoniaVaccinationSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 pneumonia continues to have high global prevalence, mortality, and morbidity with the emergence of new variants of concerns due to vaccination inequality. There continues to be limited data on the outcomes of HIV-infected patients with COVID-19. In this report, we present the case of a 62-year old male with chronic HIV who presented with unexplained fever and initial negative COVID-19 PCR, and no radiographic evidence of COVID-19 on chest x-ray or CT Chest. Due to the increased prevalence of COVID-19 and the emergence of variants of concern, diagnostic testing for COVID-19 should be repeated in patients who are persistently febrile despite previous negative swabs and lack of exposure. Patients with immunocompromised states, such as HIV infection, may have atypical clinical presentations, time to PCR positivity, or imaging findings of COVID-19. A thorough investigation for other causes of unexplained fever should also be conducted despite the community prevalence of COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207