Relationship between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Physical Activity in Patients with Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Purpose] This study researched the relationship between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and physical activity (PA) in patients with heart disease. [Participants and Methods] Forty-eight patients (mean age 72.6 ± 6.9 years) with heart disease were included in this study. MCI was evaluated using the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J). PA was evaluated by a Fitbit inspire (Fitbit Inc.) for a week which calculated the average number of steps per day as a variable. Partial correlation analysis adjusted for age and sex was performed to analyze the correlation between the MoCA-J and PA. [Results] The mean score of the MoCA-J was 25 ± 3.6 points and that of PA was 5337 ± 2534 steps/day. The partial correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between the MoCA-J and PA (r＝0.66). [Conclusion] Early detection of MCI is necessary for reducing the risk of dementia and improving PA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".