« Saigner comme un boeuf » : le sang dans les recettes de médecine populaire québécoises et françaises. Une analyse comparative
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analyse comparative de deux corpus de recettes de médecine populaire (français et québécois) recueillies par des folkloristes (XIXe-XXe). La comparaison de données reliées aux pertes de sang et saignements de nez montre : 1. l′existence de nombreuses similarités et une structure d′ensemble articulée autour des notions de clef et de ligature ; 2. de légères différences qu′explique l′écologie locale et aussi des procédés de substitution d′éléments ; 3. le plan symbolique s′exprime de manière centrée sur le magico-religieux en France et orientée sur la nature au Québec. Des hypothèses associées au mode d′encadrement des religions populaires propres aux deux aires culturelles sont suggérées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it