Abstract 349: Segmentation Of Atherosclerotic Plaque Features From Histopathology Images Using Novel Deep Learning Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Atherosclerotic plaques have a complex composition, consisting of inflammation, fibrosis, cholesterol crystals, hemorrhage, and/or calcification. The segmentation and quantification of plaque features in histopathology images form the foundation for studies evaluating plaque instability and the mechanisms that underlie the atherosclerotic process. Manual segmentation of plaque features from histology images is a tedious, time-consuming, and subjective visual recognition task. Herein, we present a fully automatic approach using state-of-the-art deep learning techniques to identify three major features of the atherosclerotic plaque: calcification, lipid core, and fibrosis. Methods: Plaques (n=70) were collected from patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy at McGill University-affiliated hospitals. Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained sections were obtained from the region with the largest plaque burden. The “ground truth annotations” for lipid core, calcification, and fibrosis were performed manually by three blinded cardiovascular pathologists, using Sedeen Viewer. A total of 23,000 patches with 512x512 pixel size were extracted from our image dataset, and divided into train, validate, and test sets. Using Transfer Learning, multi-class U-Net models for semantic segmentation were trained on the patches to extract fibrosis, lipid, and calcification plaque features. Evaluation of model performance was based on the mean value of the Intersection over Union (Mean-IOU) between the prediction results and the “ground truth annotations”. Results: Our models resulted in an overall performance of 77% for test images, and a per-class performance for the three plaque features: fibrosis = 0.77±0.2, lipid core = 0.80±0.3, calcification = 0.75±0.25. However, a qualitative evaluation by the pathologists confirmed that the prediction results in fact outperformed the “ground truth annotations”, and detected non-annotated regions. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is a first attempt at developing a fully automatic approach for atherosclerotic plaque feature segmentation from histology images. Our models can accelerate atherosclerosis research, by improving the speed, quality, and reproducibility of plaque analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".