MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313068060 · doi:10.3934/mbe.2023176

Higuchi fractal dimension is a unique indicator of working memory content represented in spiking activity of visual neurons in extrastriate cortex

2022· article· en· W4313068060 on OpenAlexaff
Gayathri Vivekanandhan, Mahtab Mehrabbeik, Karthikeyan Rajagopal, Sajad Jafari, Stephen G. Lomber, Yaser Merrikhi

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Biosciences & Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsExtrastriate cortexNeuroscienceVisual cortexFractal dimensionDimension (graph theory)Content (measure theory)PsychologyCortex (anatomy)FractalMathematicsMathematical analysisCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Working memory has been identified as a top-down modulation of the average spiking activity in different brain parts. However, such modification has not yet been reported in the middle temporal (MT) cortex. A recent study showed that the dimensionality of the spiking activity of MT neurons increases after deployment of spatial working memory. This study is devoted to analyzing the ability of nonlinear and classical features to capture the content of the working memory from the spiking activity of MT neurons. The results suggest that only the Higuchi fractal dimension can be considered as a unique indicator of working memory while the Margaos-Sun fractal dimension, Shannon entropy, corrected conditional entropy, and skewness are perhaps indicators of other cognitive factors such as vigilance, awareness, and arousal as well as working memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Biosciences & EngineeringSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207