Трансформация традиционной нательной мужской одежды мордвыTRANSFORMATION OF TRADITIONAL MORDOVIAN MEN’S UNDERWEAR CLOTHING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Статья посвящена изучению изменения нательного мужского костюма как важнейшего элемента материальной культуры мордовского народа. Мордва была первым крупным по численности народом, присоединившимся к России в середине XVI в. С этого периода начинается христианизация мордвы, сыгравшая существенную роль в ее сближении с русским народом. В результате тесных межкультурных контактов с соседями, особенно с русскими, в мужской одежде мордвы нашли отражение элементы других культур, верований, обрядов и традиций. Наибольшие изменения традиционного мордовского костюма наблюдались в конце XIX — первой четверти XX века. Они связаны с использованием для изготовления одежды фабричных материалов, а также с заимствованиями отдельных компонентов костюма у соседних народов, проживавших в Волго‑Уралье. Результат анализа источниковой и литературной базы показал, что наиболее подробно в этнографических источниках и произведениях мордовского фольклора описаны особенности изготовления и, в частности, покроя рубахи, выбора цвета, материала и подбора одежды по сезону. The article aims to study the changes in the male underwear clothing as an essential element of the material culture of the Mordovian people. Mordva was the first large ethnic group to join Russia in the middle of the XVI century. The Christianization of the Mordva started from that moment on and played a significant role in its rapprochement with the Russian people. As a result of close intercultural contacts with different ethnic groups, especially with Russians, the Mordovian men’s costume reflected influences of other cultures, beliefs, rites, and traditions. The most notable changes in the traditional Mordovian costume were observed in the late XIX — fi rst quarter of the XX century and are associated with the use of factory‑made fabric and borrowing individual costume elements from neighboring peoples living in Volga‑Urals. The study of the literature on the topic showed that ethnographic sources and Mordovian folklore provide the most detailed descriptions of the manufacture of shirts, color selection, material, and clothing choice according to the season.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".