MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313134864 · doi:10.15581/006.16.21094

Desmond BOWEN, Paul Cardinal Cullen and the Shaping of Modern Irish Catholicism, Dublin/Waterloo (Ontario, Canadá), Gill and MacMillan - Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1983, 311 pp., 14,5 X 22,5.

2018· article· en· W4313134864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Morales

Bibliographic record

VenueScripta Theologica · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrishArtHumanitiesArt historyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

14,5 X 22,5.Estamos ante un libro de carácter biográfico que no llega a ser propiamente una biografía.El autor es profesor de Historia en Carleton University (Ottawa) y' un buen conocedor de la escena eclesiástica irlandesa en el siglo XIX, tema sobre el que ha publicado varios libros.. Ha sido un gran acierto ocuparse de Cullen (1803-78), estudiado ya anteriormente por Peadar Mac Suibhne (Paul Cullen and his Contemporaries, 5 vols.1961-77 : cfr.Scripta Theologica 8 [1976] 727) y E. R. Norman (The Catholic -Church and Ireland in the Age 01 Rebellion, 1859-73,.London 1965).Porque con este trabajo, D .Bowen, que ha utilizado abundante y valioso material inédito conservado en Roma, Dublin, Londres ' y Oxford, ha establecido las bases para una biografía completa.El contenido de la obra responde muy bien a su título.La estructuración en capítulos sigue un criterio inicialmente cronológico -hasta el capítulo V : «The Archbishop of Dublin»-, que se trasforma en temático para los capítulos VI (<<The Legatine Commission»), VII (<<The Inquisition») y VIII (<

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueScripta TheologicaSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207