MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313142195 · doi:10.5114/aic.2022.121032

The role of cardiac magnetic resonance non-contrast T1 mapping in differentiation between injured and salvaged myocardium in acute and chronic myocardial infarction

2022· article· en· W4313142195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Małgorzata Urbańczyk‐Zawadzka, Robert Banyś, Ewa Kwiecień, Maciej Krupiński

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Interventional Cardiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNarodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineCardiac magnetic resonance imagingCardiac magnetic resonanceInterventional cardiologyInfarctionRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Urbańczyk-Zawadzka M, Banyś R, Kwiecień E, Krupiński M. The role of cardiac magnetic resonance non-contrast T1 mapping in differentiation between injured and salvaged myocardium in acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2022. doi:10.5114/aic.2022.121032. APA Urbańczyk-Zawadzka, M., Banyś, R., Kwiecień, E., & Krupiński, M. (2022). The role of cardiac magnetic resonance non-contrast T1 mapping in differentiation between injured and salvaged myocardium in acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2022.121032 Chicago Urbańczyk-Zawadzka, Małgorzata, Robert Banyś, Ewa Kwiecień, and Maciej Krupiński. 2022. "The role of cardiac magnetic resonance non-contrast T1 mapping in differentiation between injured and salvaged myocardium in acute and chronic myocardial infarction". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. doi:10.5114/aic.2022.121032. Harvard Urbańczyk-Zawadzka, M., Banyś, R., Kwiecień, E., and Krupiński, M. (2022). The role of cardiac magnetic resonance non-contrast T1 mapping in differentiation between injured and salvaged myocardium in acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2022.121032 MLA Urbańczyk-Zawadzka, Małgorzata et al. "The role of cardiac magnetic resonance non-contrast T1 mapping in differentiation between injured and salvaged myocardium in acute and chronic myocardial infarction." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 2022. doi:10.5114/aic.2022.121032. Vancouver Urbańczyk-Zawadzka M, Banyś R, Kwiecień E, Krupiński M. The role of cardiac magnetic resonance non-contrast T1 mapping in differentiation between injured and salvaged myocardium in acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2022. doi:10.5114/aic.2022.121032.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Interventional CardiologySame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207