MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La Résurrection du fils de la veuve de Naïm de Wicar : le défi pictural

2007· book-chapter· fr· W4313144689 on OpenAlexaff
Annie Scottez-De Wambrechies

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’œuvre la plus monumentale du palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille, La Résurrection du fils de la Veuve de Naïm, mesure 5,70 m de haut sur 9 m de long, soit 51,30 m2 de superficie : elle revient à Jean-Baptiste Wicar, un artiste davantage célébré pour sa prestigieuse collection de dessins italiens de la Renaissance, « l’un des trésors de la France et la gloire de notre grande cité flamande » selon la formule de Gonse en 1875, que pour ses talents de peintre ou de dessinateur (fig. 1).Depuis son é...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooksSame topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207