Transformers for 1D signals in Parkinson’s disease detection from gait
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the detection of Parkinson’s disease based on the analysis of a patient’s gait. The growing popularity and success of Transformer networks in natural language processing and image recognition motivated us to develop a novel method for this problem based on an automatic features extraction via Transformers. The use of Transformers in 1D signal is not really widespread yet, but we show in this paper that they are effective in extracting relevant features from 1D signals. As Transformers require a lot of memory, we decoupled temporal and spatial information to make the model smaller. Our architecture used temporal Transformers, dimension reduction layers to reduce the dimension of the data, a spatial Transformer, two fully connected layers and an output layer for the final prediction. Our model outperforms the current state-of-the-art algorithm with 95.2% accuracy in distinguishing a Parkinsonian patient from a healthy one on the Physionet dataset. A key learning from this work is that Transformers allow for greater stability in results. The source code and pre-trained models are released in https://github.com/DucMinhDimitriNguyen1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".