MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313148861 · doi:10.23952/jnva.6.2022.4.06

Stability on parametric strong symmetric quasi-equilibrium problems via nonlinear scalarization

2022· article· en· W4313148861 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zai-Yun Peng, Jingjing Wang, Yong Zhao, Renli Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChongqing Municipal Education CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNonlinear systemParametric statisticsQuasistatic processStability (learning theory)Mathematical economicsSymmetric equilibriumMathematicsApplied mathematicsEconomicsMathematical optimizationStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsEquilibrium selectionThermodynamicsGame theoryStatisticsRepeated game

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the stability analysis of a class of parametric strong symmetric quasiequilibrium problems (PSSQEP) via scalarization approaches. Based on the oriented distance function, a new nonlinear scalarization function which can separate sets {0} and -C\{0} is presented. By virtue of the scalarization function, a new form of scalar parametric strong symmetric quasi-equilibrium problem (PSSQEP) is obtained, and the union relation between the solution set of (PSSQEP) and the solution sets of a series of (PSSQEP) is established. Finally, the sufficient conditions of the Bergesemicontinuity of solution mappings for (PSSQEP) are obtained via the union relation and the nonlinear scalarization technique, which is different from the scalarization method recently announced. Some interesting examples are given to illustrate the main results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational AnalysisSame topicOptimization and Variational AnalysisFrench-language works237,207