Offensive Security: Cyber Threat Intelligence Enrichment With Counterintelligence and Counterattack
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyber-attacks on financial institutions and corporations are on the rise, particularly during pandemics. These attacks are becoming more sophisticated. Reports of hacking activities against government and commercial sector organisations have garnered a lot of attention in the last several years. By design, the focus of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) is exclusively defensive. This is because most of the CTI-derived analysis output is intended to prevent breaches or facilitate early detection. So, there is a need to have a new mechanism for unmasking the attacker. In this research, we demonstrate cyber threat intelligence enrichment with counterintelligence and counterattack combined with certain new methods to exploit the adversary’s vulnerability and fully control the attacker’s system. Attackers use a VPN to establish an anonymous connection. A VPN creates a secure “tunnelling” to the internet, with the VPN server acting as a middleman between the attacker and the web. This provides anonymity because the attacker’s IP address seems to be that of the VPN rather than his own, masking the IP address. So, hackers used this application to create persistence because it is automatically launched each time a computer is restarted. As a result, we are attempting to eliminate the persistence by removing it from the startup and registry. This research will help firms detect and identify an assault in its earliest phases, allowing them to respond accordingly. This project will develop new and innovative strategies to bypass VPNs and other security measures in order to obtain correct source information. Companies will be able to identify new methods by which their systems are penetrated and rapidly harden them. Using counterattack and counterintelligence, a proposed technique can bypass a VPN and get adversarial intel. The main goal of this research is to find the attacker’s footprints or tracks and find out why the attack was planned in the first place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".