MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mining News Data for Peripheral Culture Training in AGI

2022· article· en· W4313170366 on OpenAlex
Nicholas Dmytryk, Aris Leivadeas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Computing and Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceImplementationConversationMetaphorAbstractionInterface (matter)Human–computer interactionHuman intelligenceArtificial intelligenceMultimediaSoftware engineeringPsychologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As computing applications edge closer toward developing human-like ability, the requirement for culture aware human-machine communication is becoming paramount. Ever evolving natural language is full of abstraction, pop-culture reference, and metaphor. Rigid language understanding implementations in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems like voice assistants often lead to misunderstanding in command execution, degrading the user experience and accuracy of AI applications. Further, the inability for AI to have an understanding of the data in reference to itself limits its ability to fully comprehend conversation. Theorized Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) aids this problem through enabling cognitive data processing. This paper presents a novel method of training an AGI system through a peripheral interface using online news articles to increase its understanding of data in reference to current societal culture while heightening its overall awareness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Computing and NetworksFrench-language works237,207