Comparison of the effect of one-way and two-way fire-wind coupling on the modelling of wildland fire propagation dynamics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Operational wildland fire propagation models typically are uncoupled from the wind field or rely solely on estimations from an atmospheric model and/or meteorological observations. This leads to a frozen wind field with a high degree of uncertainty, and therefore to results drifting from the ground truth. On the other hand, a fully-coupled model is not viable for operational use due to the enormous computing effort required. This article proposes the use of real-time measurements from a drone swarm to enhance the results of a one-way coupled physics-based model (FireProM-F) to mimic the two-way coupling of fire and atmosphere. In the absence of actual measurements, synthetic data is used at the early stages of this research. The latter is generated using the WFDS levelset model with two-way fire-atmosphere coupling at various phases of the fire. Finally, the 'measured' wind field will be integrated into the target model to determine its effect on the outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it