History, Theory and Prospects of Tourism Development in the Context of Globalisation: Financial Crisis Impact on Tourism Sector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of globalisation, the development of tourism in Ukraine requires the restoration of tourism activities, integration with world leaders in the tourism sector, the use of global experience to meet consumer demand, information about existing opportunities of the tourism business, successes and benefits.Therefore, the issue of studying the history, theory, and prospects of tourism development is an urgent problem for the tourism industry.The purpose of the study is to investigate the history, theory, and prospects of tourism development in Ukraine and the world in the context of globalisation.In the process of writing the paper, general scientific methods of knowledge were used.The following methods were used: analysis and synthesis, classification and systematisation of data.In the course of the study, a model of the impact of tourism on the economy in the context of globalisation was presented.The number of citizens from different countries of the world who most often visited Ukraine is analysed.It was determined that the world is currently suffering from a financial crisis that has affected all sectors of the economy.However, the impact of crises in various spheres of economic activity in separate countries is different.As a result, experts' expectations regarding the prospects for the development of the tourism industry in Ukraine and abroad differ.The practical value of this study is conditioned by the fact that it provides information that can be useful both in a theoretical and practical sense for researchers and practitioners of the tourism sector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".