MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313207953 · doi:10.54097/ijeh.v6i2.3666

Research on the English Version of The Last Quarter of the Moon from the Perspective of Reception Aesthetics

2022· article· en· W4313207953 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jingping Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Education and Humanities · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Perspective (graphical)Object (grammar)AestheticsOrder (exchange)Research ObjectReception theorySociologyArtVisual artsHistoryLinguisticsLiteraturePhilosophyArchaeologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the theory of reception aesthetics and through the study on the English translation of The Last Quarter of the Moon, this paper will analyze The Last Quarter of the Moon translated by Bruce Humes from three aspects, choice of object, the translator and the choice of translation strategies. Then summing up experience and lessons in order to learn effective methods to improve the translation effects, pointing out the effect that the reception aesthetics to the research of translation, and promote the readers to accept translations so that effectively disseminating culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Education and HumanitiesSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207