MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313210066 · doi:10.33920/med-14-2212-06

Dynamics of matrix metalloproteinases when correcting immature hypertrophic scars with pulsed dye laser and fermencol phonophoresis

2022· article· en· W4313210066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristina V. Ismailyan, Sergey N. Nagornev, Л. С. Круглова, В. К. Фролков

Bibliographic record

VenueFizioterapevt (Physiotherapist) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix metalloproteinaseTIMP1Extracellular matrixScarsMedicinePathogenesisHypertrophic scarPathologyCell biologyChemistryInternal medicineGene expressionBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) in the pathogenesis of immature hypertrophic scars. The revealed decrease in the MMP level in the patients’ initial state against the background of an increased content of TIMP1 indicates a disorder in the mechanisms of regulation of collagen formation in a hypertrophic scar, as a result of which its synthesis significantly predominates over decay, contributing to the formation of a fibrous process. The obtained results convincingly prove that reduced expression of MMP against the background of an increased TIMP1 level is an important pathogenetic mechanism providing excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components in pathological skin scarring. The use of a pulsed dye laser (PDL) in combination with Fermencol phonophoresis promotes an increase in the MMP content in the blood serum of patients with immature hypertrophic scars. The reliable dynamics of the studied biomarkers indicates an increase in the processes of catabolism of the extracellular matrix components and an increase in the regenerative potential of the skin defect, which determine the intensity of the clinical effect during the treatment of immature hypertrophic scars. The correlation analysis between the level of membrane metalloproteinases and the parameters of the Vancouver Scar Scale revealed a set of significant relationships that confirm the clinical and pathogenetic significance of these biochemical variables in the development of fibroplastic processes and also act as informative criteria for the effectiveness of the therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFizioterapevt (Physiotherapist)Same topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207